Re: RM: gnote/testing -- ROM; uninstallable (Re: please unblock gnote_0.4.0-3~squeeze1 (Re: gnote broken in testing due to libxml++2.6 migration))
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:13:22PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 04:57:54PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> Robert Millan wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:30:46PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:05:29PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> >>>>>> In the meantime, it's uninstallable (see #533216).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Any ideas on how can this be fixed? Maybe a gnote upload to tpu?
> >>>>> That would indeed be an option.
> >>>> Okay, gnote_0.4.0-3~squeeze1 uploaded to tpu. Please consider unblocking.
> >>> Ping.
> >> Unfortunately it's not ready to be approved as it's not installed on all
> >> architectures yet.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There's something odd with s390 and hppa. 0.4.0-3~squeeze1 was built 3
> > weeks ago on both, but those binaries didn't reach the archive. I suspect
> > their queues aren't processed very often...
> >
> > In the meantime, please could you remove 0.3.1-7 from testing? Untill
> > 0.4.0-3~squeeze1 builds are finished, 0.3.1-7 is uninstallable and just
> > causing confusion.
>
> Removal hint added.
Thanks. Btw, note that meta-gnome2_1:2.24.3~4 now depends on gnote on
alpha, hppa, m68k, mipsel and mips, and it would be uninstallable on those
platforms if it migrated to testing before gnote does.
(I'm not sure if britney already knows how to handle this, but from the
looks of the PTS page, it doesn't appear to)
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
Reply to: