Re: any idea why xz-utils 4.999.9beta+20091016-1 and shogun 0.9.1-1 are not yet in unstable?
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 11:51 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Soeren Sonnenburg <sonne@debian.org> (10/12/2009):
>
> Dear Cyril,
>
> I am afraid I don't fully understand.
>
>>> Page http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=xz-utils lists
>>> xz-utils to be out of date on all archs even though it built
>>> everywhere according to
>>> https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=xz-utils
>> liblzma0 got replaced with liblzma1. Details can be found on:
>> http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
>
> But xz-utils (the source package) creates libzma1.
>
>>> Same for shogun
>> Same for shugun indeed: libshogun vs. libshogun6.
>
> Same here shogun (the source package) creates libshogun6.
>
> I understand both obsolete another package (libzma0/libshogun5) but they
> could peacefully coexist with the old package. So I don't understand why
> they don't migrate to testing and are even listed not yet build on all
> archs ...
>
> Or should I ask for RM: libshogun5 -- RoM ?
The semi-automatic cruft removal seems to not have happened yet.
Cheers
Luk
Reply to: