Re: first try at actions of suiteparse/openmpi transition (was: Re: SuiteSparse 3.2.0->3.4.0 transition)
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Can the RM team then please:
> a) add a hint
>
> hint freemat/3.6+dfsg-8+b1 illuminator/0.11.0-3 hypre/2.4.0b-2 openmpi/1.3.2-4 lp-solve/5.5.0.13-6 octave3.0/1:3.0.5-6+b1 octave3.0/1:3.0.5-6+b2 openoffice.org/1:3.1.0-5 petsc/3.0.0.dfsg-5 trilinos/9.0.3.dfsg-1 python-scipy/0.7.0-1+b1 pysparse/1.0.1-5.1 pysparse/1.0.1-5.1+b1 [2]
>
> (no idea about the correct version specifiers for bin-NMUs and what do to
> in the ocave3.0 case where different archs have different +bX)
please apply. The last package needing aging (mono) will become aged
this next nights (18->19.) testing run.
> c) try to get petsc into a working/built state or just force in without...
Still holds. The previous suitesparse transition also was forced in,
with even more broken packages. So it does not make testing worse...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Reply to: