postfix_2.3.8-1 for etch?
As mentioned before, Wietse is one of the most pedantic upstreams I've
seen when it comes to point releases. Here is the changelog for 2.3.8:
Both of the upstream fixes in 2.3.8 would be candidates to backport to
2.3.7 if I were so inclined.
postfix (2.3.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version:
- Workaround: GNU POP3D creates a new mailbox and deletes the
old one. Postfix now backs off and retries delivery later,
instead of appending mail to a deleted file. File:
global/mbox_open.c.
- Workaround: Disable SSL/TLS ciphers when the underlying
symmetric algorithm is not available in the OpenSSL crypto
library at the required bit strength. Problem observed with
SunOS 5.10's bundled OpenSSL 0.9.7 and AES 256. Also possible
with OpenSSL 0.9.8 and CAMELLIA 256. Root cause fixed in
upcoming OpenSSL 0.9.7m, 0.9.8e and 0.9.9 releases. Victor
Duchovni, Morgan Stanley. Files: src/smtp/smtp_proto.c,
src/smtpd/smtpd.c, src/tls/tls.h, src/tls/tls_client.c,
src/tls/tls_misc.c and src/tls/tls_server.c.
* Correct check for new (empty) answer to root alias debconf question.
Introduced in 2.3.6-2. Closes: #413610, #413086
-- LaMont Jones <lamont@debian.org> Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:43:22 -0700
And would you like -2? I was stalling waiting for -1 to hit etch, but
can upload the freshened czech translations if you want...
postfix (2.3.8-2) unstable-UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* Updated Czech debconf template. Closes: #414392
-- LaMont Jones <lamont@debian.org> Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:58:07 -0600
Diffstat for 2.3.7-4 vs 2.3.8-1:
HISTORY | 36 ++++++++--
README_FILES/RELEASE_NOTES | 10 +-
RELEASE_NOTES | 10 +-
debian/arch-version | 2
debian/changelog | 21 ++++++
debian/postfix.postinst | 2
src/global/mail_version.h | 4 -
src/global/mbox_open.c | 20 +++++
src/smtp/smtp_proto.c | 2
src/smtpd/smtpd.c | 2
src/tls/Makefile.in | 1
src/tls/tls.h | 1
src/tls/tls_client.c | 22 ++----
src/tls/tls_misc.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
src/tls/tls_server.c | 12 +--
15 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
thoughts?
lamont
Reply to: