On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 15:33 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 20:24 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> >
> > I have started to work on a package split for both mesa and mesa-legacy,
> > creating new packages libosmesa6-swx11{,-dev,dbg} and
> > libosmesa6-glide3{,-dev,dbg}, in which to move the relevant pieces from
> > libgl1-mesa-*. Unfortunately, since the new package depend on
> > libgl1, [...]
>
> Actually, I think they really depend specifically on libgl1-mesa-swx11
> or libgl1-mesa-glide3 respectively, or do they actually work with any
> libGL? The output of objdump -R suggests they certainly can't work with
> a non-Mesa libGL.
>
>
> > I have a patch for mesa already (needs to update for yesterday's NMU),
>
> BTW, I was a little irritated by this NMU not getting discussed at all
> beforehand on the pkg-mesa-devel or debian-x lists.
I'm sorry if this was disruptive. However, I saw no sign of any
activity to fix these bugs, the first of which was release-critical. I
did leave a day between announcing my intention (via the bug report) and
making my NMU, and I also checked with vorlon whether it was likely to
be disruptive. However it appears that bug traffic to the mailing list
is being delayed by moderation of non-subscribers - i.e. most bug
submitters and non-maintainers.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings -- ben@decadentplace.org.uk shortened to ben@decadent.org.uk
If you've signed my GPG key, please send a signature on and to the new uid.
If more than one person is responsible for a bug, no one is at fault.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part