On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:40:40PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:42:51AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:12:46PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > I thought you had been waiting a month for the gdal soname change in > > unstable... > No, we uploaded gdal last week of january and other (dependant) packages soon after. Yes, but it was stuck in NEW for a while IIRC, and the qgis upload was held up waiting for it. > Maybe bugging the remaining packages would be useful? If by "bugging" you mean "filing bugs against", then no. There are no packages in unstable that are untransitioned, there are only a handful of packages waiting on arch-specific builds or that need to age before they're candidates for testing. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature