Re: potato kernels and debian-cd

[Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>]

Daniel Barclay <dsb@smart.net> writes:

> > From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
> ...
> >
> > At 21:18 +1000 2000-04-23, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > >> kernel-image-2.0.36_2.0.36-3.deb                ????
> > >> kernel-image-2.0.38_2.0.38-3.deb                ????
> > >> kernel-image-2.2.10_2.2.10-1.deb                ????
> > >> kernel-image-2.2.12_2.2.12-4.deb                ????
> > >> kernel-image-2.2.13_2.2.13-2.deb                ????
> > >> kernel-image-2.2.14-ide_2.2.14-4.deb            conflicts w/ 2.2.14
> > >> kernel-image-2.2.14-idepci_2.2.14-1.deb         conflicts w/ 2.2.14
> > >> kernel-image-2.2.14_2.2.14-4.deb                conflucts w/ 2.2.14-ide
> > >
> > >2.0.36/2.2.10/2.2.12/2.2.13 should all be removed.

Has someone filed a bug against ftp.debian.org to remove this?  Could
they, please?

> > I don't think we should have any 2.0 kernel binary in potato.

I don't see why not?

> If 2.0.38 is kept, make sure it has the IDE disk corruption patch
> (2.0.38pre1.ide.patch.gz, if that's not something already in 2.0.38).

Have you filed an RC bug then?

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>