debian-release May 2000 by date

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

May 02

Boot floppies okay? (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today) J.A. Bezemer
Re: Boot floppies okay? (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today) Richard Braakman
Re: Boot floppies okay? (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today) Daniel Jacobowitz
Re: Boot floppies okay? (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today) Nils Rennebarth
CONFIRMED: Boot NOT floppies okay (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today) Adam Di Carlo
critical potato archive inconsistency Adam Di Carlo
Re: CONFIRMED: Boot NOT floppies okay (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today) Ben Collins
Re: critical potato archive inconsistency Brian Mays

May 03

Installed 2 packages Richard Braakman
Re: kernels in potato destabilized Richard Braakman
Re: kernels in potato destabilized Brian Mays
More packages installed today Richard Braakman
Re: More packages installed today Daniel Jacobowitz
[SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled Adrian Bunk

May 04

potato release status -- boot-floppies 2.2.13 Adam Di Carlo
Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled J.A. Bezemer
Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled Hamish Moffatt

May 05

Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html Richard Braakman
Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html J.A. Bezemer
Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html David Huggins-Daines
Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html J.A. Bezemer

May 06

Contents for potato/main/upgrade-i386 J.A. Bezemer

May 07

Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled Adrian Bunk

May 08

Packages installed today Richard Braakman
IMPORTANT - powerpc broken Daniel Jacobowitz
Re: 2.2.13 okay for first cycle? (was Re: Packages installed today) Adam Di Carlo

May 09

More installs to frozen Richard Braakman

May 13

Re: First Test Cycle starts today Josip Rodin

May 14

May 15

Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Jim Lynch
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Mike Bilow
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Karl M. Hegbloom
[dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. J.A. Bezemer
Up and running with a fully working X configuration? Karl M. Hegbloom
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Richard Braakman
potato section on security.debian.org Wichert Akkerman
RE: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works wo uld invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Andrew Weiss
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Raphael Hertzog
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. J.A. Bezemer
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Daniel Jacobowitz
Re: potato section on security.debian.org Jason Gunthorpe
Re: potato section on security.debian.org Wichert Akkerman
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. J.A. Bezemer
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Josip Rodin
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Richard Braakman
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Richard Braakman
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. J.A. Bezemer
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Mike Bilow
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Mike Bilow

May 16

regarding invalid boot-floppies 2.2.14 Adam Di Carlo
need word on next test cycle Adam Di Carlo
Re: Up and running with a fully working X configuration? Randolph Chung
Re: potato section on security.debian.org Jason Gunthorpe
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Joey Hess
Re: regarding invalid boot-floppies 2.2.14 Jim Studt
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Adam Di Carlo
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Julian Gilbey
Re: potato section on security.debian.org Wichert Akkerman
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Mike Bilow
Re: need word on next test cycle Wichert Akkerman
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Julian Gilbey
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Mike Bilow
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Herbert Xu

May 17

May 23

Upgrade.tar available (was Re: [dark: READ!] CD images) J.A. Bezemer
Re: Upgrade.tar available (was Re: [dark: READ!] CD images) Wichert Akkerman
Re: Upgrade.tar available (was Re: [dark: READ!] CD images) Ben Collins

May 26

Which kernels to keep? Richard Braakman
Re: Which kernels to keep? J.A. Bezemer
2.2.15 not out yet (was Re: Deadline?) Adam Di Carlo
Re: Which kernels to keep? Adam Di Carlo
Re: Which kernels to keep? Ben Collins

May 27

Re: Which kernels to keep? Herbert Xu
Re: Which kernels to keep? Mike Bilow

May 28

GNOME 1.0 "Bongo GNOME" Now Available by way of Elmar Fasel <ElmarFasel@gmx.de>

May 29

Re: GNOME 1.0 "Bongo GNOME" Now Available J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
No test cycle yet Richard Braakman

May 30

Test cycle status Richard Braakman

May 31

Installed today Richard Braakman

The last update was on 10:06 GMT Sat May 11. There are 82 messages. Page 1 of 1.