Bug#904688: qttools-opensource-src: FTBFS: please drop the libclang-dev B-D on some architectures
Hi Dmitry!
On 1/2/19 6:31 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>> I know the patch isn't perfect, but it helps us unblocking the reverse
>> dependencies of qttools. Currently, I have manually build qttools with
>> the patch and re-upload every the Qt team uploads a new qttools version
>> which feels like a sisyphos task [2].
>
> What do you think of splitting qdoc into a separate package?
>
> This way the packages that need it might explicitly build-depend on that
> package and dep-wait instead of getting build failures on some architectures.
That would be awesome. Thanks a lot for that.
> Also we will be able to use the Architecture: field and a proper install file
> instead of this hack in debian/rules.
>
> If you want we can upload the patch as-is now and then do a follow-up upload
> to the NEW queue introducing the new package.
I'm fine waiting for the qttools upload taking longer if it has to go
through NEW. If I know the issue is being worked on, I can continue
applying the temporary fix in Debian Ports.
> (Or maybe we can add Provides: qt5-qdoc [arch1 arch2…] which should be the
> same with regards to Build-Depends: field of other packages. But I like
> splitting more.)
Feel free to use the option which suits you best. And thanks again for working
on that. Much appreciated!
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Reply to: