On 07/05/15 15:46, Gergely Nagy wrote: > I see that in your upload of cantor to experimental at the end of > march, a cantor-backend-python package was introduced, as a > transitional oldlibs package. Since this package didn't exist before, > and depends on cantor-backend-python2, which is in stable, I don't > really get why you want a transitional package? Is it for some future > python3 migration? We are working hard on unifying the packaging efforts with Kubuntu, and we thought it was better to avoid producing different binary packages names, as it doesn't help us to maintain this kind of differences. If you think otherwise, please let us know, and we would reupload the package maintaining the differences. Happy hacking, -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." -- Rich Cook Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature