[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#730033: marked as done (okteta: FTBFS: 'QDir().mkpath(path)' returned FALSE.)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Aug 2014 13:14:03 +0200
with message-id <53E6027B.90003@debian.org>
and subject line apparently built
has caused the Debian Bug report #730033,
regarding okteta: FTBFS: 'QDir().mkpath(path)' returned FALSE.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
730033: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730033
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: okteta
Version: 4:4.11.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

Automatic builds of okteta for most architectures failed with test
suite errors:

  ********* Start testing of TestDocumentFileSynchronizerTest *********
  Config: Using QTest library 4.8.6, Qt 4.8.6
  FAIL!  : TestDocumentFileSynchronizerTest::initTestCase() 'QDir().mkpath(path)' returned FALSE. ()
     Loc: [../../../../../libs/kasten/core/tests/util/filesystem.cpp(71)]
  PASS   : TestDocumentFileSynchronizerTest::cleanupTestCase()
  Totals: 1 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped
  ********* Finished testing of TestDocumentFileSynchronizerTest *********
  [...]  
  The following tests FAILED:
  	  2 - libkasten-core-testdocumentfilesynchronizertest (Failed)
  	  3 - libkasten-core-testdocumentfilesynchronizerfactorytest (Failed)
  	 40 - oktetakasten-io-bytearrayrawfilesynchronizertest (Failed)
  	 41 - oktetakasten-io-bytearrayrawfilesynchronizerfactorytest (Failed)

I suspect these tests were relying on a writable HOME, which Debian's
autobuilders don't provide.  At any rate, could you please take a look?

Thanks!

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 4:4.13.3-1

apparently built.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: