On Jue 26 Ene 2012 17:28:26 Anton Gladky escribió: > Hi! > > As I understand, the only reason to have an arch-dependent package is > to get logs > and report them later to upstream. I'll rather think that no, the actual idea is to be sure eigen is ok in each arch. > The possible solution (quick and > dirty) is to make a 2 uploads: > 1) arch-dependent to test the package and get logs; > 2) arch-indep to have it for normal use. Definitely no. Imagine you upload an arch-indep package and then something changes in the toolchain wich make the tests fail (not necessarily with a FTBFS). If you run the tests and any of them fails, the package FTBFS and thus the mainatiner gets warned. -- Simulations are not data. In God we trust, all the others must supply data. Walter Opyd, "Show Me The Data" IEEE Spectrum's reader's comments, http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/nov04/4004 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.