Hello, On ketvirtadienis 17 Birželis 2010 20:24:13 Carlo Stemberger wrote: > Il 17/06/2010 19:12, Modestas Vainius ha scritto: > > That's wrong. Executable is simply not in PATH. Use full path to run it. > > but it's not the same... a KDE user can start the program by clicking > the icon; a * user has to type the full path into a terminal. Why this > discrimination? Because knetattach IS KDE specific, isn't? Do you think a DE can't have desktop specific applications or otherwise it is a discrimination? > > > And > > your request is harmful. > > Why? Circular dependency is a bug. > > and kdebase-runtime > > needs KNetAttach so it's a circular dependency with no benefit. > > I don't understand this point: why kdebase-runtime needs KNetAttach? IIRC, Sune explained this to you earlier. Basically, KDE apps can assume everything from kdebase-runtime is installed and knetattach is part of kdebase-runtime. We are nowhere ready to split kdebase-runtime on the distro level without upstream support. -- Modestas Vainius <modestas@vainius.eu>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.