Your message dated Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:35:44 -0500 with message-id <20100310013544.GI9022@morgul.net> and subject line Re: is last security patch in kdegraphics correct? has caused the Debian Bug report #528369, regarding is last security patch in kdegraphics correct? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 528369: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528369 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "submit" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: is last security patch in kdegraphics correct?
- From: "Andrea IACOVITTI" <aiacovitti@libero.it>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:18:15 +0200
- Message-id: <KJJ8YF$06ED9B9F7F35D1FA10AA6AFC37A8F34E@libero.it>
Package: kdegraphics Version: 4:3.5.9-3+lenny1 Hi, looking at the security patch "debian/fix-CVE-2009-0146,0147,0165,0166,0799,0800,1179-1183.diff", I discovered the patch contains a diff for file kdegraphics-3.5.9.new/kpdf/xpdf/xpdf/JBIG2Stream.cc.rej , is the patch clean anyway ? thanks, Andrea.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Eckhart Wörner <ewoerner@kde.org>
- Cc: 528369-done@bugs.debian.org, 528369-submitter@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: is last security patch in kdegraphics correct?
- From: Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:35:44 -0500
- Message-id: <20100310013544.GI9022@morgul.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201003100224.29906.ewoerner@kde.org>
- References: <[🔎] 201003100224.29906.ewoerner@kde.org>
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:24:29AM +0100, Eckhart Wörner wrote: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528369 looks like it has been > answered some time ago. Can this bug be closed? > I believe that the issue was addressed, so yes, I think the bug can be closed. I'll do so. noahAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---