Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2007 03:19:53 +0200 with message-id <200706170320.05960.sune@vuorela.dk> and subject line qmake, uic, moc and others as alternatives has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: /usr/bin/moc must not be handled by alternatives
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:28:40 +0100
- Message-id: <17864.44216.165104.840489@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Package: qt3-dev-tools Version: 3.3.7-3 Severity: serious Having both qt3-dev-tools and libqt4-dev results in moc pointing to moc-qt3 by default. Trying to generate files with moc-qt3 when files for qt4 are needed results in build errors like: ./slotcallbacks.moc.h:13:34: error: private/qucomextra_p.h: No such file or directory ./slotcallbacks.moc.h:15:2: error: #error "This file was generated using the moc from 3.3.7. It" ./slotcallbacks.moc.h:16:2: error: #error "cannot be used with the include files from this version of Qt." ./slotcallbacks.moc.h:17:2: error: #error "(The moc has changed too much.)" To reliable build, each package generating files with moc during the build and build-depending on libqt4-dev must have a build conflict against qt3-dev-tools. Same for packages build-depending on qt3-dev-tools, if you consider that the alternative can be manually adjusted as well. This seems to be a lot of work for many packages; why is moc provided as an alternative at all? It causes builds to fail, so it isn't an alternative for many cases.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 409953-done@bugs.debian.org, 363150-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: qmake, uic, moc and others as alternatives
- From: Sune Vuorela <sune@vuorela.dk>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 03:19:53 +0200
- Message-id: <200706170320.05960.sune@vuorela.dk>
Hi! We currently don't consider this a bug, but a feature to actually have both qt versions installable. if you want to be completely sure which one you use, you can either set PATH and/or QTDIR appropriately. I am closing these bugs. /SuneAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---