Le Lun 27 Mars 2006 20:53, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> Le Lun 27 Mars 2006 19:33, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
> > I noticed that the KDE maintainers keep their own patched copies of
> > some of the cdbs files. I'm integrating the uuencoded patch
> > support now, which should take care of the fork of
> > simple-patchsys.mk. The files debian-qt-kde.mk and kde.mk,
> > however, seem to have quite a bit of extra code in there that I
> > don't fully understand. Does anyone want to undertake explaining
> > this stuff to me and declaring it fit for general use so it can be
> > merged with "upstream" cdbs? In particular, what's supposed to be
> > the difference between those two files?
> [...]
> not meant to go into kde.mk, I think it's only used for kdepim and
> tarball because sometimes it's
> admin/Makefile.cvs or another one. THough, as it has to be
> called *BEFORE* inclusion of autotools.mk, we prefer to have it here.
====> this is garbage in my mail, sorry.
> line 64-86:
in fact it's line 75-86
> generate HTML docks from applications doocbooks.
>
> --> I don't know if it could go in kde.mk or not. maybe other
> members of the team may have more insight on this.
and I forgot:
line 64-73:
two hacks in one.
* we have our packaging system handle debian/$(pkg).lintian as the
lintian overrides for the package.
* we do the same for debian/$(pkg).presubj for the reportbug $(pkg)
presubj magic files.
both are quite useful (especially the first one) IMHO deserve to be
integrated in cdbs, but is really more general than kde.mk
sorry for those two errors in my previous mail.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgp8cHABY3gg4.pgp
Description: PGP signature