[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1030056: marked as done (qa.debian.org: The most recent lintian version known by UDD is 2.115.3)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Feb 2023 21:50:23 +0100
with message-id <Y+lRD965rkUcKHaO@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#1030056: qa.debian.org: The most recent lintian version known by UDD is 2.115.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030056,
regarding qa.debian.org: The most recent lintian version known by UDD is 2.115.3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1030056: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030056
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd

Hi!

In the [UDD Lintian report] for my package, I read:

[...]
| The most recent lintian version known by UDD is 2.115.3
[...]

[UDD Lintian report]: <https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=apt-listbugs>

However, there are more recent versions of lintian in both unstable
and testing:

  $ rmadison lintian | grep 'unstable\|testing'
  lintian    | 2.116.1         | testing            | source, all
  lintian    | 2.116.2         | buildd-unstable    | source, all
  lintian    | 2.116.2         | unstable           | source, all

Why is UDD outdated w.r.t. the lintian version?
Shouldn't UDD be aware of the version currently in testing, or maybe
even in unstable?

What's missing?
Did I fail to understand anything?

Please make UDD use the latest lintian version from testing or
unstable, or otherwise clarify my misunderstanding.

Thanks for your time and dedication!
Bye.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On 02/02/23 at 18:28 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 21:41:04 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> 
> > I updated lintian on the worker. The results will get updated over the
> > next few days (probably 3 to 5 days).
> 
> Thanks a lot!   :-)
> 
> [...]
> > I'll check again in a few days and close when the data is migrated.

All the data has been updated with lintian 2.116.3, with the exception
of a few packages that fail with that version, see:

#1021099 [n|  |  ] [lintian] lintian: uses a lot of memory while checking unidic-mecab_2.3.0+dfsg-6.dsc
#1031171 [i|  |  ] [lintian] lintian: error with continuous-integration/salsa on source:libvcflib_1.0.7+dfsg-2
#1020930 [i|  |  ] [lintian] lintian: fails on latex-cjk-chinese-arphic-gbsn00lp_1.24_all.deb

Lucas

--- End Message ---
Reply to: