Re: invalid and duplicate architectures

To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: invalid and duplicate architectures
From: Johannes Schauer <j.schauer@email.de>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 10:36:55 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140524083655.20924.44360@hoothoot>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140524083520.GA4952@jwilk.net>
References: <[🔎] 20140523140000.20924.60609@hoothoot> <[🔎] CAKTje6GhQrgSPHJBMxs4A=i5ytfpHHih-Bbq_DQCFkAi_-mFEQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 877g5bj4za.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <[🔎] 53803F6C.6070601@thykier.net> <[🔎] 20140524082545.20924.48922@hoothoot> <[🔎] 20140524083520.GA4952@jwilk.net>

Hi,

Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-05-24 10:35:20)
> It does here:
> 
> O: picolisp source: unknown-architecture any-armel
> O: picolisp source: unknown-architecture any-armhf

strange, then nevermind - something must be wrong with my lintian here then.

Thanks, and sorry for the commotion :D

cheers, josch

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: invalid and duplicate architectures
  - From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Re: invalid and duplicate architectures
  - From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

References:
- invalid and duplicate architectures
  - From: Johannes Schauer <j.schauer@email.de>
- Re: invalid and duplicate architectures
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: invalid and duplicate architectures
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: invalid and duplicate architectures
  - From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Re: invalid and duplicate architectures
  - From: Johannes Schauer <j.schauer@email.de>
- Re: invalid and duplicate architectures
  - From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: invalid and duplicate architectures
Next by Date: QA sprint before DebConf14?
Previous by thread: Re: invalid and duplicate architectures
Next by thread: Re: invalid and duplicate architectures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread