Re: Flagging upstream dead software (Was: DICOM viewers)

To: Debian QA List <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Flagging upstream dead software (Was: DICOM viewers)
From: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 21:53:46 +0200
Message-id: <AANLkTikcRWRc4CABZ+nAeaCuk_SsPcb7ZmVVnWSLV_4L@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <20100802085110.GA15123@an3as.eu>
References: <20100730203209.157270@gmx.net> <20100730205408.GC6369@an3as.eu> <20100730212059.157240@gmx.net> <20100730214919.GD6369@an3as.eu> <20100730224840.157240@gmx.net> <20100802085110.GA15123@an3as.eu>

Hi,

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:51, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
>  1. Where to store the information?

debtags?

>  2. How to *define* DeadUpstream?

- if upstream publicly declare there will be no other release
- if no release in X years
- too vague to express a rule here, sorry ;)

Cheers,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Flagging upstream dead software (Was: DICOM viewers)
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de>

References:
- Flagging upstream dead software (Was: DICOM viewers)
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

Prev by Date: Bug#501182: qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2390
Next by Date: Re: Flagging upstream dead software (Was: DICOM viewers)
Previous by thread: Flagging upstream dead software (Was: DICOM viewers)
Next by thread: Re: Flagging upstream dead software (Was: DICOM viewers)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread