Re: RM: ud -- RoQA; orphaned, no upstream, uptimed is better

[Nathanael Nerode <neroden@fastmail.fm>]

Matej Vela wrote:

> Nathanael Nerode <neroden@fastmail.fm> writes:
> 
>>> On 10734 March 1977, Matej Vela wrote:
>>>>   * popcon: 261 installs, 177 votes.
>>
>> This is actually quite a lot -- more than the level I'd use for removals,
>> FYI.
> 
> IMHO, popcon is helpful, but not the determining criterion for removal.
> If popcon is high, but there's no prospect of a package being adopted,
> it can still be removed (cf. elm-me+, which was more popular than ud).
> And if it's low, it doesn't necessarily imply the package must go (cue
> recent discussion).

Absolutely, I agree.  One of my favorite criteria for removal is "How long
has this been orphaned?"

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  <neroden@fastmail.fm>

Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't he in prison yet?...