[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#104672: marked as done (Build failure on hppa (at least))



Your message dated Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:24:52 +0000
with message-id <20011107212452.A19872@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Fixed in shhmsg 1.3.4-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2001 00:20:12 +0000
>From lamont@hp.com Fri Jul 13 19:20:12 2001
Return-path: <lamont@hp.com>
Received: from atlrel1.hp.com [::ffff:156.153.255.210] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15LDAK-0007kV-00; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:20:12 -0500
Received: from security.hp.com (cranston.fc.hp.com [15.1.44.224])
	by atlrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50807F8
	for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 20:20:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by security.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 23683)
	id DE0221872C; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:20:10 -0600 (MDT)
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Cc: lamont@smallone.fc.hp.com
Subject: Build failure on hppa (at least)
Message-Id: <20010714002010.DE0221872C@security.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:20:10 -0600 (MDT)
From: lamont@hp.com (LaMont Jones)
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org

Package: shhmsg
Version: 1.3.4-2
Priority: serious

The following build failure occured on hppa (using gcc 3.0):
See http://people.debian.org/~willy/common_bugs.html for more background
information.

libs/shhmsg_1.3.4-2 by bdale [optional:uncompiled]
  Reasons for failing:
    [Category: none]
    busted source package, linker says recompile with -fPIC

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 104672-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2001 21:25:22 +0000
>From cjwatson@flatline.org.uk Wed Nov 07 15:25:22 2001
Return-path: <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from carbon.btinternet.com [194.73.73.92] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 161aCI-0003Z8-00; Wed, 07 Nov 2001 15:25:22 -0600
Received: from [217.35.27.109] (helo=arborlon.riva.ucam.org)
	by carbon.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #6)
	id 161aC4-0000AP-00
	for 104672-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2001 21:25:08 +0000
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.riva.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
	id 161aBo-0005Av-00
	for <104672-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2001 21:24:52 +0000
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:24:52 +0000
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
To: 104672-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed in shhmsg 1.3.4-2.1
Message-ID: <20011107212452.A19872@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
Sender: Colin Watson <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Delivered-To: 104672-done@bugs.debian.org

This bug was fixed in Branden Robinson's upload:

shhmsg (1.3.4-2.1) unstable; urgency=low

  * NMU
  * debian/control:
    - added build-dependency on debhelper
    - bumped Standards-Version (lintian-clean)
  * debian/rules:
    - run the upstream clean rule between the make invocations for the
      static and shared objects (so that attempts to build a shared library
      using non-pic objects is not made) (Closes: #104762)
    - explicitly clean the static library in the clean rule
    - call dh_installdeb to get maintainer scripts
  * debian/shhmsg.{postinst,postrm}: call ldconfig per Debian Policy

 -- Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>  Fri, 19 Oct 2001 12:38:45 -0500

hppa seems to be building it happily now. Since shhmsg is now maintained
by the QA Group, I'm closing this bug.

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: