[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Bug#623650: mtink: is the libxp dependency necessary?
To
:
623650@bugs.debian.org
Subject
: Bug#623650: mtink: is the libxp dependency necessary?
From
: Drew Parsons <
dparsons@debian.org
>
Date
: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:47:31 +1000
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
1303444051.26732.17.camel@pug
>
Reply-to
:
dparsons@debian.org
,
623650@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to
: <handler.623650.B.130343732218799.ack@bugs.debian.org>
References
: <
[🔎]
20110422015513.27963.50051.reportbug@localhost.localdomain
> <handler.623650.B.130343732218799.ack@bugs.debian.org>
In your case the libxp6 dependency may be indirect via lesstif2-dev.
Reply to:
debian-qa-packages@lists.debian.org
Drew Parsons (on-list)
Drew Parsons (off-list)
References
:
Bug#623650: mtink: is the libxp dependency necessary?
From:
Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
Prev by Date:
Bug#623651: twpsk: is the libxp dependency necessary?
Next by Date:
Bug#623671: ca-certificates: some certificates not installing and getting errors
Previous by thread:
Bug#623650: mtink: is the libxp dependency necessary?
Next by thread:
Bug#623651: twpsk: is the libxp dependency necessary?
Index(es):
Date
Thread