[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#112443: marked as done (support for bootp in update-cluster)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:36:27 +0100
with message-id <1248546987.907430.22817.nullmailer@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line update-cluster has been removed from Debian, closing #112443
has caused the Debian Bug report #112443,
regarding support for bootp in update-cluster
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
112443: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=112443
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: bootp
Version: 2.1.3-6
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

I would like bootp to be able to be configured via update-cluster system.

Could you add support ?

Installing a script like the following in /usr/lib/update-cluster/bootptab.updatelist
with the executable bit set would do the trick (hopefully).



TMPFILE=$(tempfile)

(cat /etc/hosts | \
    awk '{printit=1} /^#Autogenerated by update-cluster/,/^#End update-cluster/{
printit=0} {if (printit) {print} }' &&
    echo "#Autogenerated by update-cluster" &&
    /usr/bin/update-cluster-parseconfig  hostname mac | \
   awk '{macaddr=$2; gsub(macaddr, ':','.'); print $1 ":ha=" macaddr }' < $CLUSTERXML &&
    echo "#End update-cluster" 
) $TMPFILE

mv $TMPFILE /etc/bootptab
rm $TMPFILE




-- 
dancer@debian.org  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.41.5-5+rm

The update-cluster package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/435897 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---
Reply to: