[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#195744: marked as done (xlander: no speed control)



Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:08:50 +0100
with message-id <874q5wca71.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2003 23:04:28 +0000
>From gmlists@centras.lt Sun Jun 01 18:04:28 2003
Return-path: <gmlists@centras.lt>
Received: from adsl-212-59-30-232.takas.lt (gintas.pasilai.udr.lt) [212.59.30.232] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19MbsJ-0000Na-00; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 18:04:27 -0500
Received: from gintas by gintas.pasilai.udr.lt with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19MbsH-0001Nc-00; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 02:04:25 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gintautas Miliauskas <gmlists@centras.lt>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xlander: no speed control
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 02:04:25 +0300
Message-Id: <E19MbsH-0001Nc-00@gintas.pasilai.udr.lt>
Sender: Gintautas Miliauskas <gmlists@centras.lt>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: xlander
Version: 19920427-4
Severity: important
Tags: upstream

The game is way too fast, impossible to play on faster machines, because
it lacks performance-independent timers.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux gintas 2.4.20 #1 Mon May 26 19:12:02 EET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT.ISO-8859-13

Versions of packages xlander depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.1-16   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  xlibs                         4.2.1-6    X Window System client libraries

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 195744-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2005 05:08:54 +0000
>From vela@debian.org Mon Nov 28 21:08:54 2005
Return-path: <vela@debian.org>
Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Egxja-0002XN-31; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:08:54 -0800
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
	by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT58ixE031532;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:08:44 +0100
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT58o5H005491;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:08:50 +0100
Received: (from mvela@localhost)
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jAT58oGx005489;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:08:50 +0100
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 195744-done@bugs.debian.org, 302922-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Removed
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:08:50 +0100
Message-ID: <874q5wca71.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

xlander has been removed from Debian due to a long-standing release-critical
bug.  Please see <http://bugs.debian.org/327672> for details.



Reply to: