Bug#145275: vchkpw: package is stuck two major versions back
Package: vchkpw
Version: 3.1.2-9
Severity: wishlist
vchkpw is infact vpopmail. a much more mature and featureful package by now, at version 5.2: http://inter7.com/vpopmail/
it works great with existing packages like courier-imap and IMP, and it seems a shame that it is not updated or joined by other GPL tools like qmailadmin and vqadmin. Is it being maintained? (I'm not sure how to check if a package is orphaned)
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux joy 2.4.19-pre7-ac2 #1 SMP Wed Apr 24 09:28:04 IDT 2002 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages vchkpw depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii qmail-src 1.03-24 Source only package for building qmail binar
ii ucspi-tcp-src 0.88-5 Source only package for building ucspi-tcp b
ii perl 5.6.1-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report
^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5)
--- Begin /etc/init.d/vchkpw (modified conffile)
#! /bin/sh
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin
DAEMON=/usr/bin/tcpserver
FLAGS="defaults 50"
HOSTNAME="$(hostname --fqdn)"
test -f $DAEMON || exit 0
[ "x$HOSTNAME" == "x" ] && exit 0
case "$1" in
start)
echo -n "Starting vchkpw pop daemon: qmail-pop3"
#ulimit -v 2048
sh -c "start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --user root \
--exec $DAEMON -- \
-u 102 -g 101 -H -R 0 pop-3 \
/usr/sbin/qmail-popup "$HOSTNAME" /var/qmail/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw \
/usr/sbin/qmail-pop3d Maildir &"
echo "."
;;
stop)
echo -n "Stopping vchkpw pop daemon: qmail-pop3"
if [ "$(start-stop-daemon --name tcpserver --user vpopmail \
--test --stop --quiet)" ] ; then
start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --user vpopmail --exec $DAEMON
echo "."
else
echo " not running."
fi
;;
restart|force-reload)
$0 stop
$0 start
;;
reload)
;;
*)
echo "Usage: /etc/init.d/vchkpw {start|stop|restart}"
exit 1
;;
esac
exit 0
--- End /etc/init.d/vchkpw
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: