On Monday, November 21, 2022 12:25:05 PM EST Scott Kitterman wrote: > On November 21, 2022 5:02:57 PM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" <pollo@debian.org> wrote: > >On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote: > >> I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should > >> proceed. Certainly we are not ready to make Python 3.11 the default > >> Python version!! > > > >This is a concern I share and I think I've been pretty vocal about it. > > > >I feel the state of python packages for Bookworm with 3.10 was pretty good > >and it seemed reasonable to prioritize stability for our next stable > >release :) > > > >It's very frustrating to work on packaging python libraries and apps for a > >whole release cycle, just to see all that work put in the bin at the last > >minute because upstream doesn't support 3.11... > > > >I've been told the current 3.11 transition was a test, and if it was clear > >too many important things were broken and couldn't be fixed, we would roll > >back and release using 3.10. > Looks like you can add #1024521 to the list. This one is fixed. Scott K
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.