On Friday, May 18, 2012 11:48:07 AM Ana Guerrero wrote: > Hi, > > I'm considering how feasible is removing Qt3 from wheezy. Even if > we freeze soon, removing packages is never a problem :-) > > One of the big parts of the effort would be removing python-qt3, there are > only 6 packages in the archive currently using python-qt3: ... > * Package: mnemosyne (#604362) The mnemosyne PyQt4 port is currently a release candidate. Although I'm not the maintainer of this package, I'm interested in it because my wife uses it. I'd be willing to help with getting the RC packaged. ... > Is it worth keeping python-qt3 and therefore Qt3 (that does not have any > maintainer) in Debian only for those apps? Are the python-qt3 maintainers > willing to continue with the python-qt3 maintenance wrt upstream work? Although I'm not listed in uploaders, I did the last python-qt3 upload. I don't have the background for upstream work, but am willing to work on packaging and integration of patches if they are available. My only interest in python-qt3 though is mnemosyne, so if we can get that updated, I'm all for removing it. Scott K
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.