Loïc Minier wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> This would mean we'd need to split e.g. python-gtk2 into five. Do we really want >> that? The "should" wording allowed one to not do it in special cases. I'm not >> saying we shouldn't change it, but we should make sure we're aware of all the >> consequences of the change... > > How about the new attached patch, "Require the python- prefix for > public modules"? Looks fine to me, but 3.1 needs to be updated too since it currently says that a package that needs `foo' must depend on `python-foo', which may not be correct anymore with this patch. Cheers, Emilio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature