Hi, On 09/08/2018 10:38 PM, Donald Norwood wrote: > > > On 09/07/2018 06:17 AM, Birger Schacht wrote: >> >> I have written a python script [0] based on `new-package-maintainers` >> that uses the public udd mirror for getting the information. I'm not >> sure what the publicity teams stance on python scripts is, but imo they >> are a bit more readable than shell (though maybe not in the case of this >> oneliner ;) ). >> >> I have also looked at the `create-rc-stats` script and tried to get an >> idea of the information that is extracted from udd. I've created a >> python script that does the statements against the public udd, but it >> runs a couple of hours and it always failes with one or two statements. >> So i took the urls the html output links to and fetched their json >> representation from the udd webform and parsed that in the script [1]. I >> still have to update the URLs for current Debian version though- i'll >> try to look at that next week. > > Thank you very much!! I ran both after installing a few needed > dependencies on my end. I used the data in a mock up as well and it > looks great. I have now updated the create-rc-stats.py python script so it fetches the numbers for buster. I've also cleaned up the script a bit, to make it easier to adapt. The release manager view number was calculated with different criteria than the one listed on https://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi, so i've adapted it. I'm still somewhat new to udd, so the numbers should probably be checked by someone more experienced with that. I'll create merge requests for both scripts. cheers, Birger / bisco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature