[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: metrics.d.n



Actually something broke. As you can see the last data is from Aug
7th. Plus Zack wanted to wait, so I would hold off on publishing this
in the weekly news.

I jumped the gun a little by requesting that metrics.d.n be advertised
in the weekly news.

Joseph

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Donald Norwood <dnorwood@portalus.com> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
>
> On 07/16/2014 07:48 AM, Joseph Bisch wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2014, Paul Wise wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the notification. Right now every page except the front
>>>> page just gives me 500 Internal Server Error so it seems that it is
>>>> too early to announce it?
>>
>> What is happening is that Holger is seeing the JavaScript interface,
>> while pabs is seeing the non-JS interface, because he has JS disabled.
>> I fixed the 500 error with the pages. I will make sure to check better
>> each time I reupload to make sure there are no errors.
>>
>> The non-JS interface just uses matplotlib to generate a static graph
>> image for each metric. It does not support overlaying multiple metrics
>> in the same graph like the JS interface does. Both interfaces have
>> tables, but the JS interface supports sorting of the table.
>>
>>> it works for me, but the data was only going back a single month. Is that
>>> an
>>> issue with my browser (which should be fixed in the site anyway) or is
>>> the
>>> site missing more data / such functionality ? I was using iceweasel from
>>> wheezy...
>>
>> The site is missing data from before a month back. The plan is to
>> eventually include historical data from some source such as UDD. But
>> that is a lower priority and will probably not be implemented before
>> the end of Summer of Code.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Joseph
>>
>>
> I do not see any errors and the site seems to be well populated, any updates
> or last minute concerns?
>
> Best regards,
> -Donald


Reply to: