Hi there! On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:00:29 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:54:28PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> As I've mixed feelings, I would very much welcome comment on the >> idea. Is it worth to risk Squeeze images? How should we present them >> then? Should we rather go for Lenny images ... or no ISOs at all? > > Thanks for all the feedback, people. Thanks to those received here and > from a few extra replies from the Debian CD team, I decided to go for > the latest multi-arch testing weekly build. I have never tested the weekly build, but the multi-arch *daily* built has problems on amd64 and i386 (not on powerpc), given that kernel modules can not be found: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600671#10 > As they are meant explicitly as give aways, something we might want to > do in the future is an artwork to be printed on top of them, which > highlights the peculiarity of those ISOs, namely: i386 or amd64 install, > sources included. It's too late for my need of this week-end, but it > might be useful / nice for further needs. I did some basic CD-cover back in 2008 for etch, but they were really basic stuff: http://lists.debian.ch/community@lists.debian.ch/2008/msg00189.html Please note that *CD* multi-arch images: - are for amd64, i386 and powerpc (there were for other archs as well, I can not find them anymore) - include the corresponding netinst image - do not inclue any sources *DVD* multi-arch images are indeed for amd64 and i386 and they include the sources. Last question: has someone tested the image you want to distribute? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
Attachment:
pgpvzRcpo5dns.pgp
Description: PGP signature