Discourse usability
Hi Neil, hi project,
thanks for putting effort in communication improvements, either on
the social or on the technical level.
I'm a Discourse user on various instances, but I'm not an admin on
any of them. This is my end-user experience:
Good:
- Discussions are usually well structured. It is easy to find start
and end points.
- Moderation or other means of filtering seem to work. At least,
signal to noise ratio was always great.
- Search function returns useful results most of the time.
- "Like this post" is a nice, low-barrier form of acknowledgment.
Bad:
- Offline usage and local archive is hard, i.e. re-reading when
disconnected, hold back a text, e.g. to think it over, is difficult.
- I like to use the console. Discourse does not work with any console
browser I tried, nor with eww. Reading is possible, login is not.
- Entering any longer text in a web browser is a nuisance. Like many,
I manually copy and paste between text editor and browser.
- The web interface is too ponderous, too cluttered, too distracting
for my taste or maybe for my age cohort.
Ugly:
- Badges. "Earned 'First Emoji'", "Earned 'Anniversary'". Is it only
me? But I feel devalued and belittled by gamification.
Note, that the "bad" points cannot, unfortunately, be mitigated by
using the email interface instead of the web interface, because:
- It does not represent the same content, i.e. some advantages are
gone, and this leads to an information imbalance between users.
- Discourse email is badly formatted and disrespects any rules one
expects in a "real" email conversation, such as quoting.
My personal and preliminary résumé is: "Something like Discourse would
be great, but maybe better something else, esp. w/o gamification?"
Sorry, this got longer than I wanted to.
Reply to: