Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 ?
On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote:
>>> When I encounter a work under CC BY 2.0, I have a hard time explaining Upstream
>>> why it is strictly necessary to upgrade it to 2.5 or more for their work to be
>>> distributed in Debian. What are the crucial changes that made CC BY 2.5 Free
>>> while CC BY 2.0 is non-Free ?
>> Alternatively, if we can not find a significant difference of freedom between
>> CC BY 2.5, and CC BY 2.0, how about accepting CC BY 2.0 in Debian ?
We don't want 2.5 in main, we want 3.0. So why?
I guess some people never change. Or, they quickly change and then
quickly change back.