Filipus Klutiero <chealer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I see that http://www.grouplens.org has moved on and their research
> > (like http://www.grouplens.org/node/126 - "The recommendations that
> > are most accurate according to the standard metrics are sometimes not
> > the recommendations that are most useful to users") may be informative
> > for anyone who thinks that message-voting will surely work.
> >
> Unless you're suggesting a recommendation system, I don't see how this
> paper is relevant.
Various messages in this thread have suggested using the votes as the
basis of a recommendation system for messages or authors.