Re: DWN
Martin Schulze wrote:
> You could also think about funding DWN if it's important enough.
The above is probably intended to be ironic, but as I've noted
elsewhere, funding DWN has been successful in the past. :-)
--
see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DWN
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- References:
- DWN
- From: "Andrew Donnellan" <ajdlinux@gmail.com>
- Re: DWN
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: DWN
- From: "Andrew Donnellan" <ajdlinux@gmail.com>
- Re: DWN
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: DWN
- From: "Andrew Donnellan" <ajdlinux@gmail.com>
- Re: DWN
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: DWN
- From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>