Processed: Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?

To: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Cc: owner@bugs.debian.org (Darren O. Benham and others) (bugs.debian.org #97671), Technical Committee <debian-ctte@lists.debian.org>(tech-ctte #97671), debian-project@lists.debian.org (project #97671)
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:33:10 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.103703212528378.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021111162834.GA7408@azure.humbug.org.au>
References: <[🔎] 20021111162834.GA7408@azure.humbug.org.au>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 97671 tech-ctte
Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
Bug reassigned from package `bugs.debian.org, project' to `tech-ctte'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: debian advocacy suggestions, anyone?
Next by Date: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
Previous by thread: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
Next by thread: Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread