Hi tluxt!
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, tluxt wrote:
> Actually, the more I think about what such a list should be about,
> and what it's name should be, the more I think we should have two lists:
>
> debian-woody-user
> debian-sid-user
It should be
debian-user-woody
debian-user-sid
_or_
debian-user-testing
debian-user-unstable
if anything at all (I don't comment on the necessity as I don't read
-user currently).
The latter two having the advantage that we need not rename the lists
once woody gets stable and a new testing is forked.
The debian-user- naming scheme makes it more clear that those are
_user_ lists, born from debian-user (compare this to your favorite newsgroup
hirachy) and also sorts nicely.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred. | : :' : By professionals,
| `. `' for professionals
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
pgpRzRE97SHaR.pgp
Description: PGP signature