Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Em Thursday 29 July 2004 20:39, you wrote:Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote: Thanks. Are the extra patches inside your attached patch good enough to contribute back to gcc mainline? e.g. would it be sensible to do mv debian/patches/glibc-2.3.2-csu-make.patch patches/glibc-2.3.2/glibc-2.3.2-csu-make.patch ?Yes. In fact I have already emailed it: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2004-07/msg00035.html
I guess I'll test with dash, then. Is this the right URL? http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/dash/ Also, have you verified that patch works with other shells? All the others are already in crosstool: glibc-2.3.2-allow-gcc-3.4-inline.patch glibc-2.3.2-without-fp.patch glibc-2.3.2-powerpc-procfs.patch sscanf.patch Why the duplication? Oh, your procedure doesn't use *any* of the patches in the crosstool patch repository, so you had to copy the ones you felt you needed, I guess. - Dan -- My technical stuff: http://kegel.com My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change