Re: Indirect dependencies
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sun, 26 Apr 1998, Mark Baker wrote:
> What isn't OK is if a package relies on an indirect dependency for
> something it needs directly itself.
Ok, do we have some example of this in the current frozen distribution?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNUMxECqK7IlOjMLFAQEiyQP/VQtx4BA4L4NfIGOoOdAhFMbh16gz1hZN
ljsV1QiWqMTMe/jS8MXAhJ5nwoghDc/QExnlVzU5KPmRLxrEG7VfFZUb5SUT71/u
uwIQRBs/dQ/16pK4AGO6YyhtJ9XWkteVr4/ZAhCA4pcmTe7v1wpvm8o0SOremRVj
PLXKaheebS4=
=IiB7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: