[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#21215: Bad load-path in 50psgml-init.el?



Hi,
>>"Rob" == Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> writes:

Rob> Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> writes:
>> I move for a clarification of the emacs policy to ensure that I do
>> not have start files from packages I do not have access to. psgml
>> and vm stand alone packages are not commonly available for all
>> emacsen flavours, and hence do not insinuate themselves everywhere,
>> and this should be the recommended behaviour.

Rob> Assuming I understand you correctly, what about just putting the
Rob> psgml and vm startup files in /etc/emacs20/site-start.d and
Rob> /etc/emacs19/site-start.d?  Then only those versions will see
Rob> it. I'll have to check to see what I wrote in debian-emacs-policy
Rob> about this, but is there any reason this wouldn't be OK?

	That is what I did. And I got a bug report about it; and hence
 I thought a clarification may save us all future bug reports ;-). It
 works just fine. At least, it has for me. 

	As I said (and I should have clarified it), I think that
 putting a start file in a subset of /etc/<emacs>/site-start.d should
 be recommended iff the package is only supported on a subset of
 <emacs>. (I thinkI mean <emacs> and not <flavour>).
	
>> emacs19 does not seem to define debian-emacs-flavor. I haveg to do
>> it manually in my .emacs.

Rob> I think this was a bug that might be fixed now...

__> emacs19 -q -nw
(symbol-name debian-emacs-flavor)
Symbol's value as variable is void: debian-emacs-flavor

	Sorry, not yet. 

	manoj
-- 
 My other computer is also a Unix system.
Manoj Srivastava  <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: