Re: Locales and Programs parsing other's output

To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Locales and Programs parsing other's output
From: James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>
Date: 11 Apr 1998 13:57:59 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] dmm90pctt0o.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: Christian Schwarz's message of "Sat, 11 Apr 1998 14:28:04 +0200 (CEST)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980411142522.26198D-100000@monet>

Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de> writes:

> I don't think this is a topic which belongs to the policy
> manual. (For example, the policy manual doesn't include a statement
> like `dereferencing NULL pointers is evil' either.)

Policy includes plenty of examples of policies which potentially
require changes to programs and are similar to this proposal, e.g
2.4.5, 3.3.6, 3.9, 4.5.  How is this any different?  (Esp. comapre
with 2.4.5)

-- 
James

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Locales and Programs parsing other's output
  - From: Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de>

References:
- Re: Locales and Programs parsing other's output
  - From: Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de>

Prev by Date: Re: `Every package must have exactly one maintainer'
Next by Date: Re: `Every package must have exactly one maintainer'
Previous by thread: Re: Locales and Programs parsing other's output
Next by thread: Re: Locales and Programs parsing other's output
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread