Re: When a bug is a bug?
Santiago Vila writes ("Re: When a bug is a bug?"):
...
> I mailed owner@bugs because I received this from you, through the bug
> tracking system:
>
> Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
> unsatisfactory and you haven't received a better one in a separate
> message then please contact the developer directly, or email
> submit@bugs.debian.org or me.
>
> The explanation was unsatisfactory, and I didn't receive a better one in a
> separate message. I was not going to contact the developer directly,
> because he was clearly refusing to relate the timestamp problem
> with the kpathsea searching algorithm.
>
> At this point I don't have clear whether the words "or me" in "email
> submit@bugs.debian.org or me" are still valid or not. Are they valid?
I hadn't realised that developers wouldn't know that there would be a
better way for them to sort this kind of thing out.
Do I need to add some text saying
`If you are a Debian developer, please use our internal procedures for
resolving disagreements over bug reports.'
?
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: