Re: libtool varying versions
On Sun, Apr 05, 1998 at 04:35:09PM +0200, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 1998 jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl wrote:
> > IMO the new libtool's behaviour (forced -rpath and no inter-library
> > dependencies) is seriously broken. The Debian maintainer should lobby
> > with the upstream author to get if fixed (or, at the very least, provide
> > options so that Linux users can specify --no-rpath
> > --inter-library-dependencies-please)..
>
> I fully agree.
>
> Could the libtool maintainer please comment on this? (E.g., is the
> upstream maintainer willing to do the changes?)
The upstream libtool maintainer is aware of the inter-libarary dependencies
issue and has a webpage about it
(http://www.profitpress.com/libtool/deplibs.html). It does not however look
like he has made a decision about it yet.
Ray
--
UNFAIR Term applied to advantages enjoyed by other people which we tried
to cheat them out of and didn't manage. See also DISHONESTY, SNEAKY,
UNDERHAND and JUST LUCKY I GUESS.
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: