[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs)



Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:

>  Mail setups that do not understand MIME are antiquated to the point
>  that most email must be hard to deal with.

Fine by me.

>  Robbe> But you were using characters outside ASCII as well, so one
>  Robbe> needs tools to turn them from UTF8 gibberish into something
>  Robbe> readable.
> 
> 	I see. Anything your parochial. limited, MUA can't render is
>  gibberish.

Obviously, since I'm not able to interpret raw UTF8 sequences beyond
U+007F in my head. You X-Face is surely to people without the right
help -- as is my GPG signature. The difference being that these are
add-ons, not important parts of the message itself.

So what's your stand now? Do I need to get tools to understand UTF8 to
be able to follow debian-policy or not?

>  And yes, my email do tend to have characters beyond plain ascii 7,
>  as the headers for my mails state.

I haven't done an analysis, but actually I've seen few mails from you
that contained non-ASCII characters in important positions. The
referenced one was one of those few, so I took it as the reason to ask.

>  Robbe> One can't use this unicode hyphen and have getopt understand
>  Robbe> it. You were pasting a commandline that didn't work. Incorrect
>  Robbe> enough for you?
> 
> 	A) I was not pasting a command line,

In another mail you said you did. Anyway, s/pasting/writing/

>  b) you would have to selectively excise and edit my email before
>  sticking it in (like, my signature would confuse apt, I would
>  think),

Sure. My MUA is advanced enough to allow that. Your point was?

>  and c) it was written to address people who could exercise a
>  modicum of common sense, really. I am sorry if it was misadressed
>  in your case.

If you read my mail, you'll certainly notice that I knew what you
meant. I just pointed out that you gratuitously used an non-ASCII
character instead of the (IMO more correct) ASCII equivalent.

>  (I shall not use the fact that I was pasting the output of man, and
>  that the utf-8 was not delibrate, as an argument, since I make no
>  bones about not sticking to ascii in my emails)

I'm going to run with this as a kind of "yes" answer to my "UTF8
mandatory" question, since you're obviously bent upon taking my
writing as useless flamage, and therefore a straight answer is
improbable.

-- 
Robbe

Attachment: signature.ng
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: