debian-policy Apr 2001 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Definition of alphanumeric?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Adam Heath
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Seth Arnold
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Branden Robinson
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Branden Robinson
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Julian Gilbey
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Ben Collins
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Definition of alphanumeric?
Julian Gilbey
Bug#92423: [PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
Henrique M Holschuh
Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
Moshe Zadka
Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
Peter Novodvorsky
Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
Brian Russo
Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
Taral
Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
Bas Zoetekouw
Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
Peter Palfrader
Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
Julian Gilbey
Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
Josip Rodin
Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
Brian Russo
Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed
Jean-Philippe Guérard
Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed
Henrique M Holschuh
Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed
Jean-Philippe Guérard
Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed
Julian Gilbey
Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed
Henrique M Holschuh
Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed
Jean-Philippe Guérard
Bug#92589: marked as done (there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13
Julian Gilbey
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13
Chris Lawrence
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13
Herbert Xu
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13
Anthony Towns
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13
Julian Gilbey
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13
Josip Rodin
Processed: accepted proposal
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: reassign
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#92744: Section 10.1.2., better example
Tommi Komulainen
Processed: closing (bah)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#92423: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file)
Joey Hess
Processed: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#92423: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file)
Adam Conrad
Bug#92423: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file)
Brian Russo
Bug#92423: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file)
Adam Conrad
Bug#92423: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file)
Brian Russo
Bug#76868: AMENDMENT 2001-02-27] invoke-rc.d interface to invoke initscripts
Julian Gilbey
Bug#76868: AMENDMENT 2001-02-27] invoke-rc.d interface to invoke initscripts
Henrique M Holschuh
Bug#76868: AMENDMENT 2001-02-27] invoke-rc.d interface to invoke initscripts
Julian Gilbey
Unidentified subject!
Denis Kosygin
Processed: 3 accepted X policy proposals
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence"
Yann Dirson
Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence"
Julian Gilbey
Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence"
Yann Dirson
Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence"
Brian Russo
Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence"
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence"
Martin Michlmayr
Bug#93047: marked as done ([TYPO] policy: "GNU Public Licence" --> "GNU GPL")
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#93295: example contradicting rationale in chapter 11 (Diversions)
Arthur Korn
Processed: another accepted X policy proposal
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd)
Jaldhar H. Vyas
Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd)
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd)
Josip Rodin
Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd)
Julian Gilbey
Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd)
Josip Rodin
Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd)
Seth Arnold
Re: Bug#93620: ftp.debian.org: debian-policy recommends a nonexistent package
Anthony Towns
Processed: Re: Bug#93620: ftp.debian.org: debian-policy recommends a nonexistent package
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#93620: ftp.debian.org: debian-policy recommends a nonexistent package
Manoj Srivastava
New versions of the FHS
Julian Gilbey
RE: New versions of the FHS
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: New versions of the FHS
Julian Gilbey
Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Julian Gilbey
Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Julian Gilbey
<Possible follow-ups>
Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Must and should again
Julian Gilbey
RE: Must and should again
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: Must and should again
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should again
Richard Braakman
Re: Must and should again
Peter Palfrader
Re: Must and should again
Julian Gilbey
Re: Must and should again
Steve Greenland
Re: Must and should again
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should again
Julian Gilbey
Re: Must and should again
Seth Arnold
Re: Must and should again
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Must and should again
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should again
Julian Gilbey
Re: Must and should again
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should again
Julian Gilbey
Re: Must and should again
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should again
Julian Gilbey
Re: Must and should again
Steve Greenland
Re: Must and should again
Manoj Srivastava
Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Julian Gilbey
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Richard Braakman
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Julian Gilbey
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Seth Arnold
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Julian Gilbey
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Richard Braakman
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Julian Gilbey
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again)
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: Must and should again
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Must and should again
Sam Hartman
Re: Must and should again
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should again
Sam Hartman
Re: Must and should again
Anthony Towns
Re: Must and should again
Julian Gilbey
Re: Must and should again
Manoj Srivastava
CVS jdg: * Get the version.ent non-compression thingy right this time!
debian-policy
Bug#93705: packaging-manual not available in sid
Javier Kohen
Bug#93705: packaging-manual not available in sid
Anthony Towns
Bug#93705: marked as done (packaging-manual not available in sid)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#93705: packaging-manual not available in sid
Debian Bug Tracking System
Help wanted
Julian Gilbey
Bug#53582: PROPOSAL] base section: let's get rid of this one at last
Julian Gilbey
Bug#53582: PROPOSAL] base section: let's get rid of this one at last
Yann Dirson
.text or .txt
Julian Gilbey
Re: .text or .txt
Branden Robinson
Re: .text or .txt
Alexander Hvostov
Re: .text or .txt
Seth Arnold
Re: .text or .txt
Alexander Hvostov
CVS jdg: Finished chapter 2
debian-policy
Bug#87994: PROPOSAL] better initscript definition, and adding 'restart-if-running'
Julian Gilbey
Bug#89039: Not policy's job?
Seth Arnold
Bug#89039: Not policy's job?
Frank Belew
Bug#89038: the informatoion in the manpage should be in policy
Julian Gilbey
Processed: [sarnold@willamette.edu: Re: Help wanted]
Debian Bug Tracking System
CVS jdg: * Typos in various documents
debian-policy
Bug#93724: base-files: please move undocumented(7) from manpages
Santiago Vila
Processed: Bug#93724: base-files: please move undocumented(7) from manpages
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#93724: base-files: please move undocumented(7) from manpages
Colin Watson
Bug#93724: base-files: please move undocumented(7) from manpages (fwd)
Colin Watson
Bug#93975: Make shared libs non-mandatory.
Daniel Kobras
Bug#93975: Make shared libs non-mandatory.
Branden Robinson
Bug#93975: Make shared libs non-mandatory.
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Bug#93975: Make shared libs non-mandatory.
Daniel Kobras
Bug#93975: Make shared libs non-mandatory.
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Processed: drop #90989
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#90989: Processed: drop #90989
Julian Gilbey
CVS srivasta: * Removed recommendation on packaging-manual
debian-policy
CVS srivasta: Removed illegasl tag <ital>; changed it to <em>
debian-policy
CVS srivasta: Fix breakage in the rules file
debian-policy
CVS jdg: Improvements to chapter 3
debian-policy
CVS jdg: Chapter 4 done
debian-policy
Re: Policy reformatting
Julian Gilbey
Re: Bug#94114: mesag3-glide2: mesag3-glide2 needs MESA_GLX_FX
Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: Bug#94114: mesag3-glide2: mesag3-glide2 needs MESA_GLX_FX
Herbert Xu
Bug#83977: PROPOSED] include Perl Policy
Brendan O'Dea
Bug#83977: PROPOSED] include Perl Policy
Julian Gilbey
Bug#83977: PROPOSED] include Perl Policy
Brendan O'Dea
Processed: Re: Bug#83977: PROPOSED] include Perl Policy
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#80343: general -> debian-policy
Colin Watson
Processed: Bug#80343: general -> debian-policy
Debian Bug Tracking System
debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
Debian Installer
Re: debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
Steve Greenland
Fixed in NMU of debian-policy 3.5.3.0
Manoj Srivastava
Processed: Fixed in NMU of debian-policy 3.5.3.0
Debian Bug Tracking System
CVS jdg: * Improvements to sections 5.1 and 5.2.
debian-policy
Bug#86507: marked as done (recommends removed package)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#93620: marked as done (ftp.debian.org: debian-policy recommends a nonexistent package)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#87007: marked as done ([TYPO] policy: ch sect 2.2 "to to" --> "to do")
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#87711: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 29/03/2001] Clarification of example configuration files)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#87828: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 14/03/2001] Deprecate confusing Build-Depends arch syntax)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#88651: marked as done (debian-policy: Section 3.2 refers to packaging manual)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#88788: marked as done (debian-policy: Typo in copyright notice)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#91276: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 2001/03/26] update policy to match new serious severity)
Debian Bug Tracking System
CVS jdg: Finished up chapter 5 changes
debian-policy
CVS log messages
Julian Gilbey
Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Colin Watson
Bug#94995: [PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Colin Watson
Bug#94995: PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Stephen Stafford
Bug#94995: PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Colin Watson
Bug#94995: PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Joey Hess
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Chris Waters
Re: Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Colin Watson
Re: Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Chris Waters
Re: Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Colin Watson
Policy for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
Bob Hilliard
Re: Policy for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
Colin Watson
Re: Policy for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
Bob Hilliard
compressed binaries in packages, for or against?
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against?
Ben Collins
Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against?
Itai Zukerman
Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against?
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against?
Taral
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against?
Chris Waters
Policy for stripping binaries
Bob Hilliard
Re: Policy for stripping binaries
Richard Braakman
Re: Policy for stripping binaries
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: Policy for stripping binaries
Richard Braakman
Re: Policy for stripping binaries
Herbert Xu
Re: Policy for stripping binaries
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: Policy for stripping binaries
Bob Hilliard
Re: Policy for stripping binaries
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Definition of Binary field in control file
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Definition of Binary field in control file
Julian Gilbey
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Lars Steinke
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Steve Greenland
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Steve Greenland
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Herbert Xu
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Steve Greenland
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Julian Gilbey
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Chris Waters
CVS jdg: * Corrections to chapter 6
debian-policy
Bug#95065: Checklist is wrong on location of examples files
David Z Maze
Bug#95065: marked as done (Checklist is wrong on location of examples files)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Proposed solution to config.{sub,guess} issues
Henrique M Holschuh
Re: Proposed solution to config.{sub,guess} issues
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Proposed solution to config.{sub,guess} issues
Henrique M Holschuh
Shared libs vs. plugins.
Daniel Kobras
Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Wichert Akkerman
[PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Seth Arnold
Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Josip Rodin
Old proposals again (Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.)
Julian Gilbey
Re: Old proposals again (Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.)
Anthony Towns
Re: Old proposals again (Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.)
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Old proposals again (Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.)
Julian Gilbey
Re: Old proposals again (Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.)
Josip Rodin
Re: Old proposals again (Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.)
Oliver Elphick
Re: Old proposals again (Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.)
Julian Gilbey
Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Seth Arnold
Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Julian Gilbey
Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Josip Rodin
Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Bug#66023: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Josip Rodin
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Colin Watson
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Richard Braakman
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Josip Rodin
Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#66023: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Josip Rodin
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Ove Kaaven
Bug#66023: [olly@lfix.co.uk: Re: Old proposals again (Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.)]
Julian Gilbey
CVS jdg: * Make # in closes: regexp optional, as in latest dpkg-dev
debian-policy
Re: CVS jdg: * Make # in closes: regexp optional, as in latest dpkg-dev
Peter S Galbraith
Re: CVS jdg: * Make # in closes: regexp optional, as in latest dpkg-dev
Julian Gilbey
[retracted] sarnold's policy diff for .so files
Seth Arnold
Bug#66023: [shaleh@valinux.com: Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.]
Josip Rodin
CVS srivasta: * [ACCEPTED 2/4/01] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail closes: Bug#42052
debian-policy
CVS srivasta: TeX got confused by the new perl regexpo in policy; had to create a woraround to package policy
debian-policy
[Typos] Debian policy
philippe batailler
Re: [Typos] Debian policy
Chris Waters
Re: [Typos] Debian policy
Julian Gilbey
CVS jdg: * Couple of minor changes reported
debian-policy
Re: Are build-dependancies mandatory?
Daniel Schepler
Re: Are build-dependancies mandatory?
Julian Gilbey
CVS jdg: * Improvements to section 7.1
debian-policy
Fixed in NMU of debian-policy 3.5.4.0
Manoj Srivastava
Processed: Fixed in NMU of debian-policy 3.5.4.0
Debian Bug Tracking System
debian-policy_3.5.4.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
Debian Installer
Bug#42052: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 2/4/01] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#83977: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 26/04/2001] include Perl Policy)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#85503: marked as done (section 3.1 of policy is confused)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#86436: marked as done (Build-Depends: should vs may)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#87233: marked as done (wording in section 9.2.2 could be better)
Debian Bug Tracking System
CVS jdg: * Finished updates to chapter 7
debian-policy
Bug#79538: Reassign to dh-make
Julian Gilbey
Processed: Reassign to dh-make
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#79541: include the apache license in base-files
Julian Gilbey
Processed: Bug#79541: include the apache license in base-files
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Merging invoke-rc.d stuff
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#87159: marked as done (explanation of Build-Depends et. al. is unclear)
Debian Bug Tracking System
CVS jdg: * Change names of policy maintainers (finish the job)
debian-policy
Processed: Merge policy bugs - take 2
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: try again
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#95906: debian-policy: Debian policy manual description should mention the packaging manual incorporation
Thomas Bushnell BSG
The last update was on 18:34 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 292 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc