[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST



On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 11:01:53PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I just checked: in policy 3.1.1.1, they were a MUST (section 2.4.2).
> I don't know when that got lost.  So we'll go back to it.

Must/Should/May only had given meanings in 3.2.1.0, so it was an accepted
amendment to change that must to a may.

I object, once again.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
  do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
                      -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)

Attachment: pgpcEmHlJbjdX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: