Re: FHS, netscape and Dan Bernstein
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:39:22AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > For inclusion in non-free, which is more significant: access to source
> > code or 100% FHS compliance?
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:44:52AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> The latter. But note that non-free is not part of Debian.
Ok. But note that dpkg could better support FHS in its treatment of
packages of /usr/local/bin/.
> Also, see http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq#djb
That's a rant. It's also out of date -- looks like it was written a
year or two ago. Most of his comments on redistribution are incorrect.
Thanks,
--
Raul
Reply to: