On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:26:09 +0100, Mikko Koivunalho wrote: > > - If you want to get Env::Assert into Debian, the easiest way is to > > ask us to package it :) > Yes, please! > Thank you. Alright, let's take this route :) > > If it's the latter: I just spent 2 minutes with dh-make-perl and > > Env::Assert, and if I spend 5 minutes more, I can upload the package > > to the archive. [0] > Have I done everything right so the packaging is as easy as possible? > Just tell me if there is anything missing. I haven't noticed anything yesterday in my 2-minute-check but thanks for the offer! > > [0] Although I just realize that this might be better named envassert > > than libenv-assert-perl, as it's more about the binary than the > > library, right? > Yes, that’s right. In this case the library is mostly a bi-product, > not really meant to be used by itself. Ok, thanks for the confirmation. > Would it be better if Env::Assert was two separate (CPAN) packages, > one for lib and one for executable? I think that would be overkill. What I often see is that distributions like this are named App-foo on the CPAN, so maybe App-envassert would be an option. But from a Debian point of view that's irrelevant … Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature