On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 20:43:24 +0100, intrigeri wrote: > gregor herrmann wrote (26 Dec 2013 18:27:50 GMT) : > > prove --verbose t/*.t > I suggest "prove --verbose --recurse t" instead, as it runs larger > parts of the test suite in many cases. Sounds better indeed, thanks :) > I guess we don't want to use the Build.PL / dzil / etc. wrappers, > since those would automatically add the --lib switch. That was my thought, too. > Too bad, as > those know exactly how to run all the tests. Yup. -- Does anyone know another generic way to run the tests? Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Charlie Parker: Parker's Mood
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature