[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#877673: marked as done (libreoffice-kde (stretch-backports) depends libreoffice-core =1:5.4.0-1~bpo9+1 but is already 1:5.4.1-1~bpo9+1)



Your message dated Wed, 4 Oct 2017 08:58:37 +0200
with message-id <20171004065837.GC27594@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#877673: libreoffice-kde (stretch-backports) depends libreoffice-core =1:5.4.0-1~bpo9+1 but is already 1:5.4.1-1~bpo9+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #877673,
regarding libreoffice-kde (stretch-backports) depends 	libreoffice-core =1:5.4.0-1~bpo9+1 but is already 1:5.4.1-1~bpo9+1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
877673: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877673
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libreoffice-kde
Version: 1:5.4.0-1~bpo9+1

Installing libreoffice-kde -t stretch-backports fails as it requires
libreoffice-core in version 1:5.4.0-1~bpo9+1 which is already in
version 1:5.4.1-1~bpo9+1

Thanks for your efforts.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
notfound 877673 1:5.4.0-1~bpo9+1
thanks

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:44:36AM +0200, Martin Johannes Dauser wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-kde
> Version: 1:5.4.0-1~bpo9+1
> 
> Installing libreoffice-kde -t stretch-backports fails as it requires
> libreoffice-core in version 1:5.4.0-1~bpo9+1 which is already in
> version 1:5.4.1-1~bpo9+1

Yes, and? 

a) the BTS is not for bpo bugs
b) libreoffice-kde was deliberately not built anmore. Read the changelog.

Maybe it needs to be manually decrufted? (CC'ing the backports mailinglist,
where this report should have gone anyway in the first place.)

Regards,

Rene

--- End Message ---

Reply to: